Operation New Year's Day
[By the way, it was really quite impossible for the cat to jump to safety. Except for maybe 5 floors downwards.]
I do not know why it did not occur to me sooner, but half an hour into the saga, I realised I could call the SPCA. After relating the severity of the incident to them, they promptly told me that they would dispatch someone to take a look. A man and woman team arrived more than an hour later; we were located at the northenmost part of the island afterall. Anyhow, the woman rang me to ask about the exact location and found the cat quickly, perching precariously on the ledge and having not moved a muscle since my parents caught sight of it. The man and woman assessed the situation, took out a restraint pole, noosed the cat effortlessly and brought it back to safety in under a minute. It was really fortunate that kitty endured the rescue without panicking, except for a little struggle when they were lifting him up. Heck, I would too if someone is attempting to lift me with a noose.
The woman gave me call again after they got the cat. I told them that the cat is a community cat waiting to be sterilised and asked for him not to be brought back with them, which she understood. It would have been really wretched to have the cat rescued only to be brought back to be euthanised. I thanked her profusely and the cat was subsequently released at the void deck. I sms-ed my parents the good news and congratulated them on a blessed 2007, having saved a life on its very first day.
But I have a Question.
This un-neutered adult tom has appeared in the neightbourhood not too long ago, most likely dumped. Perhaps he was not familiar with the topographics of the area, and hence had gotten himself in such a fix. Dumping cats, as is with trying to murder them, is a punishable offence.
Under Section 42 of the Animals & Birds Act
—(1) Any person who —
(a) cruelly beats, kicks, ill-treats, over-rides, over-drives, over-loads, tortures, infuriates or terrifies any animal;
(b) causes or procures or, being the owner, permits any animal to be so used;
(c) being in charge of any animal in confinement or in the course of transport from one place to another neglects to supply the animal with sufficient food and water;
(d) by wantonly or unreasonably doing or omitting to do any act, causes any unnecessary pain or suffering or, being the owner, permits any unnecessary pain or suffering to any animal;
(e) causes, procures or, being the owner, permits to be confined, conveyed, lifted or carried any animal in such a manner or position as to subject it to unnecessary pain or suffering;
(f) being the owner of any animal, abandons the animal without reasonable cause or excuse, whether permanently or not, in circumstances likely to cause the animal any unnecessary suffering or distress, or causes or permits the animal to be so abandoned;
(g) employs or causes or procures or, being the owner, permits to be employed in any work of labour, any animal which in consequence of any disease, infirmity, wound or sore, or otherwise is unfit to be so employed; or
(h) causes, procures or assists at the fighting or baiting of any animal, or keeps, uses, manages, or acts or assists in the management of any premises or place for the purpose, or partly for the purpose, of fighting or baiting any animal, or permits any premises or place to be so kept, managed or used, or receives or causes or procures any person to receive money for the admission of any person to the premises or place,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both; except where an owner is convicted of having permitted cruelty to an animal under subsection (2), he shall be liable to a fine not exceeding $10,000.
The punishment is insufficient, but at least cruelty to animals is an offence. (Oh, and thanks to Joe for enlightening me on the finer points of quoting the law. I just hope I haven't made a fool out of myself by trying to be technical. :))
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Grr... Sterilisation is still in the plans for him though.
5 Comments:
Whoa, thumbs up for the (quick?) thinking, haha.
That's one lucky little kitty.
On a side note, I wouldn't expect anything else from yon average meighbourhood 'friendly' Town Council.
Buncha schmucks.
& thanks for the vote @ http://youth.sg/blog/2007/01/12/winning-11-for-round-1-of-i-am-youthsg/
(Blatant blog-whoring XD)
By Guttercat, at 11:40 PM, January 15, 2007
Hey Mom!
U should have taken Law instead!! Then I'll have a mata Dad and a Lawyer Mom!!!
Heard dat Putek is missing from the neighbourhood? Could dat silly girl hitch hiked on the Musso she always sleeps on to somewhere else? Hope she's fine cos daddy said she is always there at the carpark to 'greet' him when he go over...
By Anonymous, at 1:04 PM, January 16, 2007
GC, this kitty is lucky but I wonder if he had just gotten one of our other resident cats into trouble. As Patch has mentioned, Putih has been missing for the past week. Some kid told us that he saw a pest control van at the carpark the other day.
Sigh.
Sometimes, the mischief-makers should be PTS for the welfare of the other guai guai ones.
Patch, I'm surprised your dad carries a soft spot for dear little Putih. How sweet. For now, I would choose to believe that Putih has indeed been carried away and is currently living happily in some posh neighbourhood elsewhere.
Double sigh.
By Mini-Meow, at 3:36 PM, January 16, 2007
Sadly, it's the mischief-makers who usually get away from the pest control buggers.
Really, neighbourhood kitties shouldn't be TOO socialised, it's bad for their health.
Was Putih collared? I try to do that to any strays I see, assuming I have a spare collar at hand.
Gives them a better chance against the Man, or so I like to think.
By Guttercat, at 4:52 AM, January 22, 2007
True about the bit on being too socialised. It'll actually do them good to run away from people they do not know.
But sadly, Putih is like that and still she is gone. She has always been wary of people though she'll mew gently at you from a distance. Her skittish nature also explains why it would have been tough putting a collar on her, and experience has it that the humans in our neighbourhood steal the collars we put on our strays. Geez.
I'm thinking one reason that she was the only one caught because her ear was not tipped. All the others are still around. Though Putih was sterilised years ago but the careless vet forgot to tip her ear and we didnt want to put her through the trapping and anaesthetic once more - once was traumatizing enough for her we thought, or so we thought.
Ear tipping saves lives.
By Mini-Meow, at 11:11 AM, January 26, 2007
Post a Comment
<< Home